Case 3:02-cv-02304-MRK
Document 120
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 2 of 5
If “No” ______________, proceed no further and report your finding on this claim in favor
of defendant DOC.
(2)
That plaintiff has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that such conduct was
sufficiently severe or pervasive to unreasonably interfere with a reasonable person’s
work performance, to alter the conditions of her employme nt or to create an abusive
working environment?
If “Yes” ______________, proceed to Question 3.
If “No” ______________, proceed no further and report your finding on this claim in favor
of defendant DOC.
(3)
That plaintiff has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiff’s race was
the reason for this conduct?
If “Yes” ______________, proceed to Question 4.
If “No” ______________, proceed no further and report your finding on this claim in favor
of defendant DOC.
(4)
That Defendant Erik Sousa was plaintiff’s supervisor during times relevant to her
complaint of a racially hostile working environment:
If “Yes” _______________, proceed to Question 5.
If “No” _______________, proceed to Question 7.
2