Contribution Verdict Form - Comparative Negligence Not An Issue - Verdict For Plaintiff Page 2

ADVERTISEMENT

(Instructions to Jury: If you find that any party listed on the verdict form was not legally responsible
in a way that proximately caused plaintiff's injury, you should enter zero (0)% as to that party.)
[Signature lines]
Verdict Form and Notes adopted January 2010. Notes revised June 1, 2012.
Notes on Use
This verdict form is appropriate to use in cases where there are contribution claims involving
one or more third-party complaints and where the issue of contributory fault will not be decided by
the jury. However, if the plaintiff suffers multiple, separable injuries and not all of the defendants are
alleged to have caused each of the separable injuries then a modified verdict form may be necessary.
th
See Auten v. Franklin, 404 Ill. App.3d 1130, 942 N.E.2d 500, 347 Ill.Dec. 297 (4
Dist. 2010). If
there is an issue of contributory fault, use IPI 600.14. This instruction serves as a basis to determine
all fact issues relating to liability of the defendants, third-party defendants, joint and several liability
and contribution.
B45.03A2 is similar to this verdict form, except it lacks the paragraph “Second” providing for
findings for or against third-party defendants. B45.03A2 is intended for use in cases involving
contribution claims among defendants tried concurrently with the plaintiff's claim.
If there is no issue of contributory negligence, the Committee recommends against including
non-parties on the verdict form. Compare Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc., 232 Ill.2d 369,
385 (2008) and Jones v. DHR Cambridge Homes, Inc., 381 Ill.App.3d 18, 31-32, 885 N.E.2d 330 (1st
Dist. 2008) with Bofman v. Material Serv. Corp., 125 Ill.App.3d 1053 (1st Dist. 1984) and Smith v.
Central Ill. Pub. Serv. Co., 176 Ill.App.3d 482 (4th Dist. 1988).
Section 600, Page 30 of 33

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Legal
Go
Page of 2