JV-426
CHILD'S NAME:
CASE NUMBER:
Custody of the child and services
10. By prior order of the court, the child was removed from the
mother
presumed father
biological father
legal guardian
Indian custodian
other (specify):
and placed with a previously noncustodial parent, the
biological father
mother
presumed father
11.
Family maintenance services were ordered for the previously noncustodial parent, and regarding that parent,
a. the extent of progress toward eliminating the conditions or factors requiring court supervision has been
none
minimal
adequate
substantial
excellent
b. the services offered by the county agency to eliminate the conditions or factors requiring court supervision were
adequate
inadequate
c.
By a preponderance of the evidence, conditions that would justify the initial assumption of jurisdiction
under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 still exist or those conditions are likely to recur if supervision is withdrawn.
Family maintenance services are continued
(1)
as previously ordered.
(2)
as modified
(a)
on the record.
(b)
in the case plan.
d.
Conditions that would justify the initial assumption of jurisdiction under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300 no longer exist.
Those conditions are not likely to exist if supervision is withdrawn. Family maintenance services are terminated.
e.
The previously noncustodial parent indicated in item 10 is granted custody of the child under the custody order
and final judgment entered this day. Visitation with the child is as ordered in Visitation Order—Juvenile (form
JV-205). The clerk of the juvenile court must file with the family court a completed Custody
Order—Juvenile—Final Judgment (form JV-200) and Visitation Order—Juvenile (form JV-205).
12.
By prior order of the court, reunification services were ordered for the
mother
presumed father
biological father
other (specify):
Regarding that person:
a.
The extent of progress made toward alleviating or mitigating the causes necessitating the removal has been
none
minimal
adequate
substantial
excellent
b.
Services offered by the county agency designed to aid in overcoming the problems that led to the initial removal were
adequate
inadequate
c. Reunification services are
(1)
terminated.
(2)
continued
(a)
as previously ordered.
(b)
as modified
on the record.
(i)
(ii)
in the case plan.
The return of the child would not create a substantial risk of detriment to the child's safety, protection, or
d.
physical or emotional well-being and is in the child's best interest. The child is ordered returned to the custody
of the person. The county agency will provide family maintenance services, and the person will participate in the
services as specified in the case plan. The factual basis for this order is
(1)
as stated on the record.
(2)
as follows:
JV-426 [Rev. July 1, 2011]
Page 3 of 5
FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER IN-HOME STATUS REVIEW HEARING—
CHILD PLACED WITH PREVIOUSLY NONCUSTODIAL PARENT
(Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 364, 366.21)
1
2
3
4
5
