5) Ability to Engage Students with Course Content
Readily engaged students effectively and placed proper emphasis on important points.
Engaged students with material in a comprehensive, organized fashion.
Engaged students or presented material to students but not always within a proper context.
Did not engage students successfully or present material well to students.
NA
NR
6) Professionalism (meets responsibilities and deadlines, is fair and impartial, has appropriate interactions
with students, is appropriately prepared and punctual)
Appears very professional
Appears mostly professional, could use improvement in one or two minor areas such as
__________________________________________________________________________________
Appears marginally professional. Needs improvement in several minor or a major areas such as
__________________________________________________________________________________.
Appears unprofessional. Needs major improvement in ______________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
NA
NR
Summary of primary strengths observed:
Summary of suggested areas of improvement:
TA’s Comments/Response
(NOTE: TA’s signature below is required by The Graduate School and indicates that the TA has read and understood
his/her evaluation; it is not an indicator of approval. The TA should use the following space to offer any general
comments regarding the observation, or of agreement or disagreement, and continue in an attachment if needed.)
Class Observer _________________________________________Date ___________
TA’s Supervisor _________________________________________Date___________
TA ___________________________________________________Date___________
To be filled out by The Graduate School: Received in Graduate School (Date):
Send copy to Ms. Tonya Vance in 100-A Gillis Bldg, 40506-0033 or email to tonya.vance@uky.edu.
Questions? Email morris.grubbs@uky.edu
Revised 02/11