Standard Rating Criteria
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Housing Federal Housing Commissioner
for Section 202 Program Applications
Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Sponsor's Name and Address
Section 202 Project Number
PRAC Number
Metro/
Revenue
Nonrevenue
Total
Nonmetro
Units
Units
Units
Address of Site(s)
Capital Advance Amount
$
PRAC Amount
Score
$
Technical
Factor Over-All
Rating Factors and Bonus Points
Discipline
(Points) Rating Rating
1. Capacity of the Applicant and Relevant Organizational Staff
(25)
PM
a.
The scope, extent, and quality of the Sponsor’s experience in providing housing or related
(15)
services to those proposed to be served by the project and the scope of the proposed project
(i.e., number of units, services, relocation costs, development, and operation) in relationship
to the Sponsor’s demonstrated development and management capacity as well as its
financial management capability.
FHEO
b.(1) The scope, extent, and quality of the Sponsor’s experience in providing housing or related
(5)
services to minority persons or minority families.
PM
b.(2)
The scope, extent, and quality of the Sponsor’s ties to the community at large and to the
(3)
elderly communities in particular.
FHEO
b.(2)
The scope, extent, and quality of the Sponsor’s ties to the minority community.
(2)
(-3 to -5)
PM
c.
A fund reservation the Sponsor received under either the Section 202 Program of Supportive
Housing for the Elderly or Section 811 Program of Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities in FY 2003 or later has been extended beyond 24 months (-3 pts.), 36 months
(-4 pts.), or 48 months (-5 pts.) (except if the delay was beyond the Sponsor’s control).
(-3 to -5)
PM
d.
If the amount of amendment money required in connection with a fund reservation received
under either the Section 202 Program for Supportive Housing for the Elderly or the Section
811 Program for Persons with Disabilities in FY 2003 or later was 25% or less of the original
capital advance amount (-3 pts); between 26% and 50% (-4 pts); and over 50% (-5pts).
2. Need/Extent of the Problem
(13)
(10)
EMAS a.
The area of the proposed project has an unmet needs ratio of 15 percent or less (10 pts.);
OR, the area of the proposed project has an unmet needs ratio of greater than 15 percent
(5 pts.); OR, the area of the proposed project has no unmet needs for housing assistance
(0 pts.).
(3)
PM
b.
The extent that a connection has been established between the project and the community’s
Consolidated Plan, Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) or other planning
document that analyzes fair housing issues and is prepared by a local planning or similar
organization.
3. Soundness of Approach
(45)
VAL
a.
The proximity or accessibility of the site to shopping, medical facilities, transportation, places
(18)
of worship, recreational facilities, places of employment, and other necessary services to the
intended occupants; adequacy of utilities and streets; freedom of the site from adverse
environmental conditions; and compliance with site and neighborhood standards (24 CFR
891.125(a), (d) and (e)).
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page 1 of 3
form HUD-9879-CA (8/2007)
ref. Handbook 4571.3 Rev-1