Research Review And Approval Form

Download a blank fillable Research Review And Approval Form in PDF format just by clicking the "DOWNLOAD PDF" button.

Open the file in any PDF-viewing software. Adobe Reader or any alternative for Windows or MacOS are required to access and complete fillable content.

Complete Research Review And Approval Form with your personal data - all interactive fields are highlighted in places where you should type, access drop-down lists or select multiple-choice options.

Some fillable PDF-files have the option of saving the completed form that contains your own data for later use or sending it out straight away.

ADVERTISEMENT

Research Review and
Approval Form: Parts A and B
This form serves as both a decision making tool and application for IRB approval of
research projects involving human subjects.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Principal Investigator Name: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Street: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
City: _______________________________________________________________ State: ______ Zip/Postal Code: ___________
Phone Number: ___________________________
Email Address: ____________________________________________________
Project Title: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Project Duration: from ______________________________________ to __________________________________________
Research is a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, through dissemination by publication or
presentation. Human subjects are living people about or from whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through interaction or
identifiable private information. The Principal Investigator is the person conducting the research who is responsible for assuring that all research
procedures are followed correctly. The Principal investigator is under the auspices of the University, such as a staff member at the University or
State Library. When systematic data about human subjects are collected, especially for the purpose of dissemination, an IRB review and approval
process must be followed according to federal regulation 45 CFR ( ).
TYPES OF IRB REVIEW
1) Types of IRB Review: Depending on the level of risk of the research protocol and the participant population, IRBs may conduct either full board
review or expedited review.
a) Expedited Review
i) For certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk and for minor changes in previously approved research,
the IRB Chair and a designated voting member or group of voting members review the proposed research rather than the
entire IRB.
ii) It cannot be assumed that research poses minimal risk because it involves only interview or survey data collection. Sensitive
questions may lead to distress that exposes participants to greater than minimal risk. Loss of confidentiality can cause
harm to participants, their relatives, and others. The IRB determines the designation of Expedited Review.
iii) See the following web site for a list of procedures which may be approved through expedited review:
b) Full Board Review
i) When full board review is necessary, the research proposal is presented and discussed at a meeting at which a quorum of
IRB members is present.
ii) For the research to be approved, it must receive the approval of a majority of those voting members present.
iii) IRB members may participate by means of electronic and/or telephonic communication and need not be present physically.
c) Research Exemptions from IRB Review
i) Under Federal regulations [45 CFR 46.101 (b)], certain categories of activity are considered research but may be declared
exempt from review by the IRB. This determination must be made by the IRB prior to the research being conducted.
ii) Certain low-risk research is exempt from the requirements in the Federal regulations concerning IRB review and approval.
If a study falls into one of the exempt categories, researchers still have ethical responsibilities to protect participants' rights.
The researcher should not make the final determination of exemption from the applicable Federal regulations or the provisions of the institution.

ADVERTISEMENT

00 votes

Related Articles

Related forms

Related Categories

Parent category: Education
Go
Page of 4